Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.
KMID : 1137020110220010025
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
2011 Volume.22 No. 1 p.25 ~ p.31
The safety of conization in the management of adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix
Kim Mi-La

Hahn Ho-Suap
Lim Kyung-Taek
Lee Ki-Heon
Kim Hy-Sook
Hong Sung-Ran
Kim Tae-Jin
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the occurrence of residual or recurrent disease after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) of the uterine cervix.

Methods: Medical records of 99 patients with a histologically diagnosis of AIS of the uterine cervix by conization between 1991 and 2008 were reviewed retrospectively.

Results: Seventy eight of 99 patients (78.8%) had negative and 18 (18.2%) had positive resection margins of the conization specimen, and 3 (3.0%) had unknown margin status. Of the 78 patients with negative margins, 45 underwent subsequent hysterectomy and residual AIS were present in 4.4% (2/45) of patients. Ten of the 18 patients with positive margins received subsequent hysterectomy and 3 patients (30%) had residual AIS. Twenty¡ªeight patients had conservative treatment and during the median follow¡ªup time of 23.5 months (range, 7 to 124 months), only one patient (3.6%) had recurrent AIS and was treated with a simple hysterectomy. Eight patients became pregnant after conization, 4 of them delivered healthy babies, one had a spontaneous abortion and 3 were ongoing pregnancies.

Conclusion: Patients with positive resection margins after conization for AIS of the uterine cervix are significantly more likely to have residual disease. However, negative resection margin carries a lower risk for residual AIS, therefore conservative management with careful surveillance seems to be feasible in women who wish to preserve their fertility.
KEYWORD
Adenocarcinoma in situ, Uterine cervix cancer, Conization, Conservative treatment
FullTexts / Linksout information
Listed journal information
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø